|
Comparison of Different Techniques for Modelling of Flow Field and Homogenization in Stirred Vessels
Moštěk, M., Kukuková, A., Jahoda, M. and Machoň, V. Comparison of Different Techniques for Modelling of Flow Field and Homogenization in Stirred Vessels Chemical Papers, Vol.59, No. 6a, 2005, 380-385
|
|
Document type:
|
Článok z časopisu / Journal Article |
Collection:
|
Chemical papers
|
|
Attached Files |
Name |
Description |
MIMEType |
Size |
Downloads |
n596aa380.pdf
|
596aa380.pdf |
application/pdf |
522.04KB |
0 |
Author(s) |
Moštěk, M. Kukuková, A. Jahoda, M. Machoň, V.
|
Title |
Comparison of Different Techniques for Modelling of Flow Field and Homogenization in Stirred Vessels
|
Journal name |
Chemical Papers
|
Publication date |
2005
|
Year available |
2005
|
Volume number |
59
|
Issue number |
6a
|
ISSN |
0366-6352
|
Start page |
380
|
End page |
385
|
Place of publication |
Poland
|
Publisher |
Versita
|
Collection year |
2005
|
Language |
english
|
Subject |
290000 Engineering and Technology 290600 Chemical Engineering
|
Abstract/Summary |
Application of different simulation techniques to predict flow field and tracer distribution in a stirred tank was investigated. Impeller motion was explicitly modelled using the Multiple Reference Frames technique (steady-state simulation of the impeller motion) and the Sliding Mesh model (unsteady-state simulation), implemented in the FLUENT code. Simulations were performed for turbulent flow regime using the standard k-ε turbulence model. Already, using the steady-state simulation approach fairly good prediction of the tracer homogenization in the vessel stirred with the pitched blade turbine was obtained. Simulation results were further improved using the Sliding Mesh model. However, the use of dynamic simulation was about 100 times more time-demanding in contrast to simulation based on the Multiple Reference Frames with the “frozen” flow field.
|
|
|
|